Search

Cover submission

processed

At the Hop by Tennessee

Submitted by

Tar Heel

On September 30, 2017

Performance

performance

Vamos A Bailar

By Tennessee

Completeness

57%

Processed by

Bastien

On August 23, 2020

Created performance

Created work

Created release

Language
Spanish
Release
Hoy Estoy Pensando En Ti

Hoy Estoy Pensando En Ti

Release date
1986
Label
Alligator Records (3)
Catalog number
56.0055
Format
Album 12" LP

Other submissions on this release

Additional comments and sources

Sources used: Discogs; YouTube; etc.


Other links to allow for verification:


Assuming Spanish....


For main submission, see https://secondhandsongs.com/case/79273



History

Change by Bastien
2020-07-06 14:34:40 UTC
Assignee: Bastien
 
Comment by Bastien
2020-07-06 14:34:59 UTC

Translation by...?

 
Change by Bastien
2020-07-06 14:35:01 UTC
Status: open need info
 
Change by Tar Heel
submitter
2020-07-06 15:45:23 UTC
Status: need info incomplete
 
Comment by Tar Heel
submitter
2020-07-06 15:45:23 UTC

If I could have readily found the translator, I would have provided:


Vamos a bailar · Tennessee

Hoy estoy pensando en ti

℗ 1986 Warner Music Spain, S.L.

 
Change by Bastien
2020-07-24 12:03:11 UTC
Status: incomplete open
 
Comment by Bastien
2020-07-24 12:03:23 UTC

Did you check the LP?

 
Change by Bastien
2020-07-24 12:03:25 UTC
Status: open need info
 
Comment by Tar Heel
submitter
2020-07-24 14:38:41 UTC

While oversights and omissions can and do occur, my standard practice is to check the autogen notes, credits on Discogs entries, and credits on readily found images at the date of original research and at the date of submission (including those for other releases, for instance singles and compilations). After those dates, entries can be expanded, new autogens posted, and additional/better images made readily available, so sometimes a fresh look will yield results.


Given those practices, etc., a) one can assume I checked the LP images at the date of original research and likely at the date of submission and b) it is far more efficient for editors to look themselves at the date of review/processing given the chance of subsequently available information and the occasional oversight. Also remember what is illegible/unidentifiable to me may be the opposite for others.

 
Comment by Bastien
2020-08-23 16:45:37 UTC

The answer was indeed on the label, see attachment.

 
Change by Bastien
2020-08-23 16:45:46 UTC
Attachment: 244619 (2).jpg
 
Change by Bastien
2020-08-23 16:47:17 UTC
Status: need info processed
 
Comment by Bastien
2020-08-23 16:47:17 UTC

Added, thanks!

 
Comment by Tar Heel
submitter
2020-08-23 17:03:56 UTC

And as explained in the "main submission", Discogs entries can and often are edited and this specific entry has been edited at least twice over the last 12 months. This submission is now almost 3 years old.


Doesn't happen often, but there are times when the Discogs entry has no credits per track upon research but upon revisit for submission or editor review they are there. Frankly, the concept of what was then vs. what is now isn't that difficult....