Highlights

To help you navigate the long list of cover versions, we have expanded the "Highlights" section with a series of qualitative/subjective tags. A few examples:

• Definitive: Jeff Buckley's version of Hallelujah
• More famous than the original: Frank Sinatra's version of New York, New York
• Editor's pick: Scary Pockets' version of Wild World

Feel free to make suggestions on how we can further improve the visualization of our cover songs!

Sent a reply request to all editors as a heads up

I continue to hold the position that an additional column on the Versions tab that shows these tags would be far more effective.

It's very wonderful that you put a display on cover, depending on popularity. I like that. Consider this read.

Read. Although I think this is very arbritrary. I.e. I think the Leonard Cohen version is far better than the Jeff Buckley one. So I don't support the idea.

1) I agree with VV!!

2) Highlights section??? Where the heck is that scetion?

3) Editor's picks??? Where is that at and sign me up!

Read but confused.

Quote from Canary

Read. Although I think this is very arbritrary. I.e. I think the Leonard Cohen version is far better than the Jeff Buckley one.

Qualitative tags are by definition arbitrary and subjective. It's the whole idea

However, I see this feature evolve in a tagging-system that is individual, and the definitive version would become the one with the most definitive tags.

"Read but confused" about sums up my reaction, too.

"Definitive?"

Frank Sinatra's New York, New York isn't? Tina Turner's What's Love Got to Do with It isn't?

Quote from DashBoardDJ856

3) Editor's picks??? Where is that at and sign me up!

It's one of the performance tags.

Quote from Jeff Chamberlain

"Definitive?"

Frank Sinatra's New York, New York isn't? Tina Turner's What's Love Got to Do with It isn't?

I totally understand your point, see my reply to Canary.

Quote from DashBoardDJ856

2) Highlights section??? Where the heck is that scetion?

Go to any work or performance, you will find a Highlights Tab.

Quote from Bastien

Quote from Jeff Chamberlain

"Definitive?"

Frank Sinatra's New York, New York isn't? Tina Turner's What's Love Got to Do with It isn't?

I totally understand your point, see my reply to Canary.

Jeff

I think certified contributors can also add tags, so you can tag particular performances if you think they should be highlighted.

Sebastian

Quote from Jeff Chamberlain

"Definitive?"

Frank Sinatra's New York, New York isn't? Tina Turner's What's Love Got to Do with It isn't?

And actually, I think it's good for our website tags will generate that kind of discussions.

It's a good start Big thanks to you and Mathieu for implementing phase one.

A few suggestions from me:

1. I'd certainly include "hit songs" in the highlights tab. This will extend beyond those marked as "more famous than the original".

2. I'd consider displaying more than just one performance in each category. There's enough space on the page.

3. Do we really still need "I Feel Lucky"?

And a few technical points:

1. The highlights tab is currently still displaying above the versions tables. Presumably this is not necessary anymore?

2. Will performances with a Spotify link and no YouTube video display on the highlights tab? I hope so.

3. How is the "popular" category identified? It often produces some counterintuitive suggestions.

Sebastian

Quote from sebcat

1. The highlights tab is currently still displaying above the versions tables. Presumably this is not necessary anymore?

See ticket #2946.

Quote from sebcat

3. How is the "popular" category identified? It often produces some counterintuitive suggestions.

Based on hits.

Quote from sebcat

2. I'd consider displaying more than just one performance in each category. There's enough space on the page.

I'd like to keep just one, as I see each header as a future entry to a new page giving the full ranking of the tag in question.

Nice to see that we're expanding the use of the tags

Got it now.

1) I think your calling the "Tags" button, the "Highlight Tab" .

2) The "Editor's Pick", I see once an editor picks it another editor can't do the same. Or you can't undo it, if you picked it yourself.

Quote from DashBoardDJ856

1) I think your calling the "Tags" button, the "Highlight Tab" .

No. The Highlight Tab is the Highlight Tab.

See attachment.

Wonderful Life

Quote from DashBoardDJ856

2) The "Editor's Pick", I see once an editor picks it another editor can't do the same. Or you can't undo it, if you picked it yourself.

Agree. I'd like to see those user-specific in the future.