Cover submission
Song Sung Blue by Jan Höiland
Submitted by
On August 14, 2017
Performance
Långsamm Sång
By Jan Höiland
Cover of
Written by Neil Diamond
Completeness
Processed by
On April 14, 2021
Created performance
Created work
Written by Bo Carlberg
Created release
by various artists
1972
- Language
- Swedish
- Additional credits
- Bo Carlberg
- Release
- Svensktoppar 15
Svensktoppar 15
- Release date
- 1972
- Label
- Flora
- Catalog number
- TNBL 881
- Format
- Album 12" LP
Additional comments and sources
History
Added, thanks
Corrections: Långsamm Sång instead of Långsam sång and Höiland instead of Høiland - for the double m in the title and the ö/ø in the artist name you would normally issue error reports...
I'll add some more tracks to the release. Should you have posted submissions for them, let me know.
IDK... You entered "Långsam sång" for the work and performance. Must have been a typo/paste error, as this is the only recording of this adaption currently in my notes (i.e. no uniform title).
I also don't see any images of the back cover or discs, so why deviate from the "Jan Höiland" alias as indicated by Discogs, Just scanning down the covers under his entry, and that alias looks to be used for ~50% or more. Frankly, I doubt I would notice the difference. The autogen does reconcile with your styling, but you place no weight on those:
Provided to YouTube by The Orchard Enterprises
Långsam Sång · Jan Høiland
Svensktoppar 15
℗ 1972 Arne Bendiksen Records AS
Released on: 1972-02-29
Also note:
I see no double m, which is gramatically wrong, anywhere on the referenced pages and they all spell Høiland correctly, so not deviated... Considering your many properly styled? error reports, I actually doubt you wouldn't have spotted both differences (if left the way submitted).
Btw./FYI: Høiland (real name and as listed, here) on Norwegian releases, Höiland on Swedish ones.
Thanks for spotting Jens'es submission. Another one not showing on the artist page. Attributed to him, straightaway.
Okay.... One of the problems here is that you've (at no fault of your own) picked a bad example to try and make a point. Also I don't claim to be the most detailed oriented contributor (as opposed to... some). In fact, I openly stated that I don't care about lots of details. I do claim to likely be more observant than most and to actually listen to the performances during my reviews. Now down the line:
a) While admittedly not clear, I acknowledged a typo/paste error on my part and my notes were corrected.
b) I must be really blurring things, as now I do see "Jan Høiland" for "Långsam Sång" on the release. "Jan Höiland" is used for the similar "Sommarens Sång" on that same release and is my uniform artist name in my notes. That is likely the source of the styling I used for the submission.
c) These types of accented letters are foreign to me. I would have likely not spotted the difference and it is highly doubtful I would question/report the styling differences if I had due to my unfamiliarity. Another example the comes to mind is (the German?) "ss" vs. [double squiggly line things]. I ignore any possible differences that I see for the same reasons. Just a bad example.
Frankly, I don't recall filing much on noticed styling/title errors until B- dinged several submissions for that very reason. (A failure to remember to convert from my uniform titles to the actual titles.) Star-worthy = error-worthy, so I started to report more. An interesting related exchange:
https://secondhandsongs.com/message/203510
For some reason that I now can't recall, I got pulled down a Swedish rabbit hole resulting in my reviewing lots of entries with your name on them, which coincided with a personal exchange. While I currently ignore a lot of styling/title errors, the current circumstances clearly affected when I opted to report. A perfect storm perhaps.
Now, on an unrelated yet current matter: https://secondhandsongs.com/topic/76620
Wasn't it you who went ape poo over your claim that I was refusing to adhere to site rules? I didn't refuse, simply stating that I don't do the thing that the rule covers. On the other hand, you seem to be clearly and openly refusing to adhere to a site rule. You also questioned having someone like that with SHS authorities. My next post in that more public thread will be along these lines unless the situation is better resolved. As a courtesy to you, I am informing you in this less public thread first,