This series exists in both labels… should only in Columbia [EMI] according to the logo?
Principally concerned: camembert electrique and of course the opinion of dany
______
Olivier
We noticed that you are using an ad blocker. Our extensive database of cover songs is made possible through advertising revenue.
To continue enjoying our content, we kindly ask you to consider disable ad blocking on SecondHandSongs. Alternatively, you can enjoy an ad-free experience by subscribing to our premium account.
Thank you for supporting us and helping keep our content accessible!
This series exists in both labels… should only in Columbia [EMI] according to the logo?
Principally concerned: camembert electrique and of course the opinion of dany
______
Olivier
This series exists in both labels… should only in Columbia [EMI] according to the logo?
I agree.
Most releases attributed to Columbia [US] were added before we separated Columbia [US] and Columbia [EMI].
The US series was installed by then editor Rodders200 and the EMI one rightly be walt
______
It must schwing (Alfred Lion, co-founder of Blue Note)
This series exists in both labels… should only in Columbia [EMI] according to the logo?
In this case, the logo does not have an influence.
Here, the important data is the release date. We must stick to 1931 as the crucial year for distributing records between these two Columbia: USA and EMI.
This series was created in Europe before 1931 .... therefore:
Columbia [US] Established in 1888
Columbia [EMI] Established in 1931
NB 1
The word "Sweden" is better to suppress... because there are records made in the UK and Norway.
NB 2
The Columbia [EMI] catalog cannot own records prior to 1931.
Last edit: 2025-01-21 14:45:20 UTC by dany
DS xxx series -----> Including DS 568, DS 521 and DS 581 (all of them released in 1930)
That's because Columbia Graphophone Ltd. already used that Columbia logo prior to 1931 in Europe. I would therefore include those three with the other lot, also to avoid confusion.
Columbia [EMI] Established in 1931: DS (x)xxx series ----> DS 769 (released in 1932) and all subsequent.
I of course agree to that.
The word "Sweden" is better to suppress... because there are records made in the UK and Norway.
That's (only) where they were manufactured. All DS records were released in Sweden (like DB in Britain, DF in France etc.)...
______
It must schwing (Alfred Lion, co-founder of Blue Note)
If I understood correctly, Dany wants to do as for the series [US] DB 1-563 [till March 1931] and
[EM] "DB 564-... [from April 1931 on]"?
______
Olivier
If I understood correctly, Dany wants to do as for the series [US] DB 1-563 [till March 1931] and
[EM] "DB 564-... [from April 1931 on]"?
Yes, like we discussed here Error report #57225
And where there were also different points of view
JoJo greets
in the Error report #57225 discussion, jojo proved that the logo was already used before 1931 and dany agreed.
We should also keep in mand that the US Columbia was owned by the UK based Columbia Graphophone Co. Ltd. before 1931. That's the company credited on those three Swedish singles released in 1930.
Therefore, they also need to be attributed to Columbia [EMI].
______
It must schwing (Alfred Lion, co-founder of Blue Note)